Who is the most uninformed American about the Royal Wedding, the one I understand was this weekend in the Mother Country?

Is it you? If it’s not you, then It’s me.

Just had other stuff going on–had to mow, etc.–and was involved in a wedding a couple of weeks ago and am wedding-ed out.

I know it involved Prince Harry and Meg. And I’m sure it was spectacular. I like a Royal Gala as much as the next guy.

And let’s admit: they made a lovely couple. Prince Chuck and Prince Hank can pick ’em.

Prince Harry is my kind of prince. Served his country in the armed forces and looks dashing in uniform. No free pass for him.

And what an example he and his brother have had from their grandmomma. Queen Elizabeth: now there is my kind of queen and my kind of matriarch. She has been queen since four months after Mickey Mantle hit the first of his record 18 home runs in the World Series (Game 6 in ’52) as the Yankees beat Brooklyn for their fourth consecutive world title, if memory serves. Nobody can Endurance Queen quite like Queen Elizabeth.

I would suspect that even after all these years, after all the Royal Visits and Royal Proclamations and Royal Teeth Cleanings, the Royal Wedding was still a big deal for her.

The bride I knew was famous but I didn’t know what for. I have since discovered she was on “Suits,” a TV show that has nothing to do with haberdashery and everything to do with law. It’s the “L.A. Law” of the 2010s, perhaps. (Remember when you didn’t miss “L.A. Law”?) She has since resigned from actressing because you can’t be royalty and act at the same time. You can only act like royalty.

To the Mother Country from Lincoln Parish, best wishes to the newlywed couple, who must have been terribly hard to buy for.

-30-